Daily Progress, Jacksonville, TX

Letters to the Editor

October 18, 2011

New crooks in TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline

RUSK — There are many reasons why East Texans should fight being forced to serve as a conduit for sending dirty tar sands crude to China– among the greatest investors in Canadian tar sands fields. To name a few:

The huge disparity between the number of  jobs that TransCanada projects it will bring to Texas (over 50,000)  and the State Department’s estimate (156-379 temporary jobs over three years, a number supported by a recent study at Cornell University’s Global Labor Institute);

The threat  to our Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer, which supplies water to 60 East Texas counties, should a spill occur;

The lack of an emergency response plan in case of a major spill;

The size of the tar sands crude carbon footprint: there is 17 percent more carbon and greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming in this crude,  than in conventional oil;

The company’s strong-arming of property owners to sign over their rights and let the pipeline go through.

The list goes on.

But here are some disturbing new developments:

In September, the State Department posted a notice of  public hearings to be held in areas of the country which will be impacted directly by this pipeline.  Parties in favor, and in opposition, were invited to make comments.  A hearing in Port Arthur, Texas, was followed by one in Austin.

There was one catch: speakers were signed up on a first come, first served basis, and local pro-pipeline organizers made sure their people got there first. When those opposed were finally able to comment, their time was cut short.   In Austin, the microphone was shut off at 2 minutes, with no warning signal so speakers could hurriedly complete their thought.  At 8 p.m., the hearing was abruptly adjourned.  Two dozen would-be opposition speakers, who had waited hours for their chance, were denied time to comment.  When  one man politely asked why he and others had been left out, he was arrested.

This is not my idea of democracy at work.

Yet, there is a reason why those in opposition to the pipeline were treated differently than those in favor: Instead of the State Department holding the hearings, an outside company, Cardno Entrix, was engaged.  Cardno Entrix also represents TransCanada.  Unbelievably, evidence has now emerged that Cardno Entrix wrote all three environmental impact statements for the State Department on the proposed pipeline.  Not surprisingly, these documents failed to address major environmental concerns.

In addition, TransCanada lobbyist Paul Elliot failed to disclose, when he registered as a foreign agent to lobby the State Department, that he had previously worked on Secretary of State Clinton’s presidential campaign.

These are clear conflicts of interest, and should be a clear signal to us that TransCanada is not the “good neighbor” in those full page, full color, folksy newspaper advertisements.

We should do everything in our power to keep this ruthless corporation out of East Texas.

Suzanne Morris

Rusk , Texas

1
Text Only
Letters to the Editor
  • Commending ag exemption views

    I have read the recent JDP letters regarding the Ag/Timber Exemptions with great interest and concern. This issue concerns a plan by our county Appraisal District to reevaluate our actual timber or agricultural usage of a property to increase revenue.

    April 19, 2014

  • H.O.P.E event offers chance to help locals in need

    A social worker once said to me “it is not easy to be poor in a small town.” Her reasoning varied but attributed it to a lack of public transportation, accessible healthcare, and employment opportunities. Other reasons were unavailable social service resources, employment training and higher education opportunities.

    April 10, 2014

  • April is Child Abuse Awareness Month

    Child Protective Services investigated more than 160,000 allegations of child abuse or neglect in Texas last year.

    April 9, 2014

  • Ag, timer exemptions a ‘money grab’

    I recently wrote a letter that was critical of the Appraisal District for forcing landowners to jump through hoops and spend money to maintain timber and ag exemptions on rural property.

    April 8, 2014

  • Local veteran: ‘Is that what we fought for?’

    The other night I was sitting at the house feeling alone and feeling down in the dumps. Wishing I was back in Vietnam, wishing I was anywhere but here in Cherokee County

    April 5, 2014

  • A few more words on ag exemptions

    People who claim an ag exemption and really do not tend to it are not benefitting the economy; all they are doing is forcing the rest of us to pay higher taxes to make up for their dishonesty.

    April 4, 2014

  • Crying foul

    What an amazing bit of gerrymandering in the opening lines of an article posted by Fox News this morning. The article: “Critics cry foul as feds place lesser prairie chicken on threatened species list” began with the first line with: “The Obama administration on Thursday announced plans to place the lesser prairie chicken on a list of threatened species...” and was quickly followed with: The Fish and Wildlife Service's decision, set to take effect around May 1 ... ”

    April 3, 2014

  • Appraisal District ‘doing its job’

    The letter to the Editor criticizing the steps being taken by the Appraisal District to verify whether or not owners of 11 acres or less are making legitimate use of their ag exemption exudes naïvete, disingenuousness, ignorance and a failure to understand economics.

    April 2, 2014

  • Clearing up decision to audit property

    It’s rarely advised to engage in a ‘letter to the editor’ debate.  However, in view of our current activities and the recently posted letter to the editor in a local newspaper regarding such, I am writing this response to set the record straight.

    March 29, 2014

  • A plea for politicians to pick up signs

    Just wondering who should pick up the political signs after the elections are over?

    March 28, 2014